Skip to main content

Bypassing Defenses: Symantec Endpoint Protection

In this edition of Bypassing Defenses, we’ll highlight how we were able to bypass the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solution Symantec Endpoint Protection on a recent Red Team engagement, enabling the execution of known malicious tools without detection or prevention.

Smarter Not Harder

The beginning of this engagement was particularly frustrating as the client used CrowdStrike Falcon for the primary EDR solution in their environment. CrowdStrike Falcon gave us a difficult time by preventing several tools, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) from working that we had previous success with on prior engagements in terms of evading CrowdStrike Falcon.

Our progress was affected enough that it forced us to focus on how to bypass CrowdStrike, rather than focusing on arguably more important aspects of the engagement such as identifying security misconfigurations and/or gaps in alerting and response.

Luckily, CrowdStrike Falcon provided enough wiggle room that we were able to use tools to perform password guessing attacks against domain user accounts. The password guessing attacks led to the compromise of credentials for an account that had Local Administrator privileges over a limited number of systems in the environment. 

Specifically, the compromised account credentials provided remote administrative access to hosts running legacy operating systems that used Symantec Endpoint Protection, which is un/fortunately easy to disable with Local Administrator access.

Access to legacy systems running Symantec Endpoint Protection allowed us to continue the Red Team engagement without having to further interact with CrowdStrike Falcon.

Tamper Protection

An attacker with Local Administrator access to a system can typically perform any action they want on that system, such as performing sensitive operating system-related actions or disabling host-based security products as described in this Cylance post

I emphasize the term typically because modern EDR solutions should have built-in tamper protection technologies that prevent an attacker from disabling the security product, despite an attacker having Local Administrator access or full control over a system. 

Disabling Symantec Endpoint Protection

In the case of Symantec Endpoint Protection, their implementation of tamper protections is a bit lacking. An attacker with Local Administrator credentials, remote access, and a single command can disable Symantec Endpoint Protection by killing the process ccSvcHst.exe.

To give Symantec Endpoint Protection some credit, it has some form of tamper protection capabilities as it will try to restart the ccSvcHst.exe process almost immediately after the process is killed. 

However, Symantec Endpoint Protection will stop attempting to restart the ccSvcHst.exe process for several minutes if the process is killed multiple times in a row. This will leave Symantec Endpoint Protection temporarily disabled and provide an attacker plenty of time to execute TTPs before it attempts to re-enable itself:

Screenshot showing Symantec Endpoint Protection disabled by killing the related ccSvcHst.exe process within the White Oak Security blog.

Using this technique, we were able to complete the rest of the assessment using only legacy systems that ran Symantec Endpoint Protection and use any known malicious tool that we wanted. 

EDR Solutions

EDR solutions in their current state should not be thought of as effective means to prevent or detect an attacker that is of moderate or high skill level. 

At their best, EDR solutions should only be expected to be effective against known tools, techniques, and procedures with no bypass techniques applied. 

While this may not seem like much, EDR solutions still play a critical role in taking a layered approach to a more secure environment. 

Through a combination of host and network-based protections, comprehensive and responsive alerting, following best practices, training, etc. your organization can work towards shrinking the attack surface available for an attacker to take advantage of.

A great way to validate the effectiveness of your organization’s security program is to conduct adversarial simulation exercises. These exercises mimic the actions of a true attacker, helping to identify the security gaps attackers are most likely to exploit. Adversarial simulation exercises will also allow you to train and assess your staff by providing realistic experience in handling active cyber incidents.


White Oak Security is a highly skilled and knowledgeable cyber security testing company that works hard to get into the minds of opponents to help protect those we serve from malicious threats through expertise, integrity, and passion. 

Read more from White Oak Security’s pentesting team.